Built by mid-September 2025, up from a bench that was effectively empty every time someone quit (versus a $1,500-a-month staffing agency that had delivered only 7 to 8 candidates over several months).
A record month, beating the business's own $345,000 goal by roughly $19,000 once the new pipeline was in place.
A 4-hour, $25-an-hour paid software audit, run before a candidate ever touched a real customer file.
What a candidate is paid to prove stamina and customer skills in the field, before any formal job offer.
A staged, paid tryout can turn hiring chaos into a hiring system: one concrete contractor built a 28-candidate pipeline and posted a record $364,000 install month, without changing who was doing the selling or the work.
That's what happened for Owen (not his real name), a concrete repair contractor running just 2 crews and 4 field installers, thin enough that a single no-show could throw the whole schedule into a scramble.
Owen closed 2024 with $3.1 million in sales and only 2 installation crews to deliver it. Just 4 technicians carried the entire field operation. There was no backup, no bench, nobody ready to step in when someone quit or ghosted an interview.
"I am exhausted. I'm ready to not do that again."
— Owen, after 3 straight days doing crawlspace work himself because a crew was short a person
Candidates would book an interview and simply skip it, with no process in place to catch that before it hit the schedule. A staffing agency, paid $1,500 a month, delivered only 7 to 8 candidates over several months before Owen cut it loose. Stuart Trier named the real issue directly: most owners treat hiring as something they do reactively, after they're already short-staffed, instead of something they build before they need it.
Why would a skilled tradesperson show up for a company they've never heard of over one they have? Nothing about a standard job posting gave them a reason to.
Stuart's reframe was simple: getting employees is a marketing function.
"People don't think of it as a marketing function, but the reality of it, it is a marketing function, especially when you're bringing people in to a blue-collar job at a pay that's similar to other places."
— Stuart Trier, Founder & CEO, Clear Results
Every other employer nearby is offering roughly the same starting pay. A candidate with no relationship to the company yet has no real reason to show up for an interview, let alone take the job. A better job posting wouldn't have solved that. What Owen's team built instead was a staged, paid evaluation funnel that filtered for real performance instead of interview performance, before a single dollar went into training someone who wasn't going to work out.
A learnability audit is a short, paid test that measures how fast a candidate can absorb real training and reproduce it independently, before a business spends real money onboarding them.
Instead of a resume or a good interview, the candidate gets a self-contained task with a real cost attached, and the business watches what they do with it. For Owen's team, that meant paying an estimator candidate $25 an hour for a 4-hour session ($100 total) to watch training videos on the company's design software, then pass 2 drawing tests: recreating the video's example, then building a layout from scratch using only what they'd just learned. Candidates who couldn't do it were filtered out before a single lead or a single hour of supervisor time went to them. The $100 works as insurance against a costlier mistake: a bad hire nobody catches until it's expensive to unwind.
The rebuilt process ran in a fixed order, each stage cheaper and faster than the one that came before it.
First: a short integrity pre-screen, a quick character-and-values check that replaced a slower legacy version. Second: recorded video questions, an async way to see how a candidate communicates before anyone spends a live interview slot on them. Third: the paid learnability audit described above. Fourth: a paid field tryout at $200 a day, riding along with a veteran rep. Owen's team pre-framed every stage to the candidate up front.
"We're going to pre-frame it of like, hey, we want you to understand it's a tryout for the job."
— Stuart Trier
Once a rep felt confident a candidate was ready to run appointments solo, usually 2 to 3 weeks in, pay shifted to $200 a day or commission, whichever was higher.
But the rollout wasn't clean. Owen let go of an underperforming rep over quality and customer complaints, and the staffing agency got cut soon after.
Its own process had broken down: interviews booked to the wrong calendar, a notification cap nobody could explain. Even the funnel itself wasn't foolproof. A strong new hire turned out to be left-handed on an estimating app built entirely for right-handed use, a detail nobody caught until it showed up on a ride-along.
Still, passing every stage of the funnel doesn't guarantee a clean transition into the job. Does a strong tryout score predict a strong first month on the job? Not on its own, as one new hire proved directly.
Travis cleared every paid evaluation stage and still struggled once he was running appointments on his own, second-guessing decisions he'd already been trained to make. Owen had to step in directly: "You're making perfect the enemy of good right now," he told him. "I need you to just go ahead and make some mistakes. And I'm telling you that I will deal with those mistakes." A good filter catches technical readiness. It doesn't replace the coaching that comes after someone's hired.
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Active recruiting pipeline | Near-empty; scrambling after every departure | 28 active candidates (September 2025) |
| Screening method | Phone interviews and resumes, high no-show rate | 4-stage paid filter before any offer |
| Field evaluation | Direct hire, no pre-hire field test | $200/day paid ride-along before a formal offer |
| Completed installs (best month) | Constrained by crew shortages | $364,000 (September 2025), against a $345,000 goal |
By mid-September 2025, the pipeline held 28 active candidates, a bench that simply hadn't existed before. That capacity showed up directly in the numbers that month: $364,000 in completed installs, the business's second-best month ever, with an estimated $31,000 surplus after debt payments. Heading into 2026, Owen is planning around 3 fully staffed crews for the year, with a fourth under discussion.
Any trade that hires off interviews alone runs a version of this risk.
An HVAC contractor sees it in reverse-technical form. A "certified" diagnostic tech can still interview well and take hours to troubleshoot a basic board. A paid shop session working a real fault on a test board catches that before it ever reaches a customer's system.
Plumbing companies hit it on flat-rate work. A candidate who talks a good interview can still rush a job, leave a slow leak behind drywall, or struggle to run a sewer camera well enough to explain findings to a customer. A paid shop trial building and pressure-testing a real assembly, before any live job, surfaces that early.
Roofing companies see it at height, where the stakes are physical as much as financial. An estimator who reads storm damage well on paper can still misjudge pitch, wreck a job's margin, or freeze up on a steep roof once the ladder's finally against the house. No interview will ever reveal that. A paid ride-along on an actual roof, in real weather, will show it within a single morning.
Not in this business's experience. Framed clearly as a mark of a serious, selective employer, it tends to read as a sign of quality. Every stage is paid: $25 an hour for the office session, $200 a day for the field tryout. A strong candidate isn't giving up income to be evaluated.
It's built as a short, clearly pre-framed evaluation. Candidates are told directly, up front, that it's a tryout for the job, never left ambiguous. Any business considering this should still get its own legal and payroll guidance on how to structure and classify tryout pay correctly for its state before running something similar.
Think of it as insurance against a bigger cost. Paying $100 to test a candidate's actual learnability, or $200 a day to see how they perform in the field, is small next to the real cost of a bad hire: wasted leads, wasted supervisor time, and a slow, expensive path to letting someone go who never should have passed the interview in the first place.
That's exactly what the paid field tryout is for. No matter how a candidate does on a controlled office task, several real days riding with the crew reveal work ethic, stamina, and attitude that a test can't. It puts the final call in the hands of the people who'll work alongside them.
Because years of experience can also mean years of bad habits and resistance to a new system. Testing learnability, how fast someone absorbs a real training task and reproduces it, surfaces candidates who can be brought up to the business's own standard quickly, which matters more day to day than a resume line.
Not quite. Where a typical home service coaching program hands an owner a framework and checks in once a month, this kind of hiring redesign gets built directly against the business's own numbers: a funnel priced and staged around real pay figures, tested against real candidates, and adjusted weekly rather than reviewed once a month. Nobody handed Owen a generic hiring checklist at a monthly call.
Stuart Trier is the Founder and CEO of Clear Results. Over the past 20 years, Stuart has built, bought, and sold 11 companies across the home service, healthcare, and marketing industries. He built his first company from startup to $8M in revenue in 3 years before a successful exit, then built a chain of 28 healthcare clinics and sold the business to a publicly traded company. Following that acquisition, Stuart spent 3 years working alongside the CEO, helping lead the organization through a take-private transaction before participating in a nine-figure exit to a Fortune 10 company. Today, he's the lead investor behind an electrical services platform operating across 3 U.S. states, and has worked directly with owners through 1,800+ strategic advisory sessions.
A concrete repair contractor ran one service at a 60% gross margin and another at 45%, and neither his marketing spend nor his sales commissions were built to tell the difference. Redirecting both toward the higher-margin work, and capping the rest, came months before a deeper pricing fix.
A specialty concrete contractor hit $3.1m in sales and had just $16,000 to show for it, then borrowed on credit cards to cover payroll. Fixing how the business priced its own overhead exposed a $190/hour burden hiding in every job, and one price increase turned the year around.
